Labor & Employment Law
Posts by Labor & Employment
Vermont Legislature Considers Expanding Paid Leave
The Vermont House of Representatives recently…
FTC Proposes New Rule to Bar Non-compete Agreements in Employment Contracts
On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission…
2023 New Shareholders Announced
Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer is pleased…View All Practice Area Posts >>
Our firm guides clients in virtually all aspects of employment law to resolve workplace problems. Attorneys in our Labor & Employment Law Group have extensive experience in state and federal litigation matters including those alleging breach of employment contract, wrongful termination, wage and hour, harassment, discrimination, and related claims. The firm represents clients before federal and state administrative agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the United States Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Vermont Attorney General's Office, and the Vermont Department of Labor.
Our firm’s attorneys have insight into how matters play out in litigation and use a strategic approach to guide clients through difficult personnel situations. We are experienced in mediating and defending claims in the administrative and court settings. The Labor & Employment Law Group also keeps clients informed of changing federal, state and local employment laws.
- Counseling on employment practices, employee discipline, employee terminations, drug & alcohol testing, internal investigations, workplace audits, employee safety, Internet privacy, protecting confidential and proprietary information, resolving workplace problems and other employment issues
- Preparation of personnel policies and manuals
- Contract negotiation, including employment and separation agreements for executives and licensed professionals
- Responding to government inquiries and audits
- Counseling on compliance with state and federal statutes and regulations affecting the workplace, including Vermont’s Fair Employment Practices Act, state and federal family and medical leave laws, unemployment compensation and workers’ compensation laws, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act and Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Frequently Asked Questions
No. An employer must pay an employee overtime for all hours worked over 40 in a work week unless the employee specifically meets an exemption from the overtime provisions of state and federal law. If the job duties of an employee’s position do not qualify for an exemption, the employee must be paid overtime (1.5 times their regular rate) for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek.
“Employee at will” is a legal term that means that the employee has no legal contract with the employer. They can leave the company, or be terminated, with or without cause.
Employee manuals can be good tools to communicate with your clients employees about policies and procedures which you would prefer not to have to repeat again and again when asked. However, you should be extremely cautious in preparing a document that could be read as providing contract rights to your employees. You need to strike the right balance in addressing these conflicting goals.
A brief consultation with your attorney will help you to size up whether it is worth contesting the employee’s request. Just because an employee is terminated for good reason does not necessarily mean that they are prohibited from receiving unemployment.
There are several different tests to determine whether a worker can properly be classified as an independent contractor instead of an employee, e.g., for federal tax, state unemployment and workers compensation, wage and hour purposes, etc. Increasingly, state and federal law has narrowed the definition of an independent contractor. Misclassification of a worker as an independent contractor could lead to substantial employer liability for back taxes, overtime pay, benefits, audits, and other liabilities. Consult with counsel if you have any questions about worker classification.
Even where an employer has terminated an employee for poor performance, there is still a possibility that the employee could claim the employer’s given reason is pretext for some type of unlawful discrimination or retaliation. It is generally in an employer’s best interests to document an employee’s performance issues, outlining how the employee has failed to meet his/her job duties and/or the employer’s expectations, with specific examples. Contact counsel if you wish to discuss potential areas of liability and mitigating risk in advance of any employment termination.
The NLRA applies to all employers. Regardless of whether an employer is unionized, Section 8 of the NLRA prohibits employers from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in their rights to engage in concerted activities. There is a wide range of activities that are considered “concerted”. Generally, “concerted activity” requires two or more employees acting together to improve wages or working conditions, but the action of a single employee may be considered concerted if he/she involves co-workers before acting, or acts on behalf of others. For example, employers must use caution not to prohibit or dissuade employees from discussing their wages or other working conditions, as such action could violate the NLRA.